Premium
Alveolar Bone Resorption Following Coronal Versus Apical Approach in a Mucoperiosteal Flap Surgery Procedure in the Rat Mandible
Author(s) -
Binderman I.,
Adut M.,
Zohar R.,
Bahar H.,
Faibish D.,
Yaffe A.
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
journal of periodontology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.036
H-Index - 156
eISSN - 1943-3670
pISSN - 0022-3492
DOI - 10.1902/jop.2001.72.10.1348
Subject(s) - mandible (arthropod mouthpart) , medicine , dental alveolus , coronal plane , dentistry , resorption , alveolar process , bone resorption , orthodontics , anatomy , pathology , botany , biology , genus
Background: In several publications, we have reported that a distinct resorptive phase of alveolar bone developed during 3 weeks following elevation of a mucoperiosteal flap in rats by a coronal surgical approach. In the present study, we compared the alveolar bone loss after mucoperiosteal flap surgery by a coronal approach (COR) to a surgical approach incising the mucosa close to the tooth apices and separating the mucoperiosteum toward the tooth crown (apical approach, AP). Methods: Eighteen Wistar rats were divided into 2 experimental groups; each group consisted of 9 rats. In the first group, COR was performed on both buccal and lingual aspects on the right side of the rat mandible, while the left side served as a sham‐operated control. In the second experimental group, AP was performed. Results: In the AP group, the outer aspect (buccal or lingual) of the alveolar bone was slightly resorbed usually at the level where the mucosa was incised. In many sections, extensive modeling of new trabecular bone was seen, coronal to the surgical incision. On the contrary, the coronal surgical approach revealed an extensive resorptive phase, mainly of the periodontal aspect of the alveolar bone. Conclusions: The results of this study show that periodontal surgery by a coronal surgical approach stimulates a burst of remodeling of the alveolar bone in a very specific pattern. J Periodontol 2001;72:1348‐1353.