z-logo
Premium
CO 2 Lasers and Temperature Changes of Titanium Implants
Author(s) -
Oyster David K.,
Parker William B.,
Gher Marlin E.
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
journal of periodontology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.036
H-Index - 156
eISSN - 1943-3670
pISSN - 0022-3492
DOI - 10.1902/jop.1995.66.12.1017
Subject(s) - thermocouple , implant , materials science , titanium , laser , biomedical engineering , dentistry , composite material , surgery , optics , medicine , physics , metallurgy
L asers may be useful in uncovering submerged implants or in removing contaminants from “ailing” implants. The purposes of this study were to record temperature changes at the bone‐titanium implant interface when using a CO 2 laser to: 1) uncover the implant at second stage surgery; and 2) “decontaminate” exposed implant threads. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to characterize surface changes of lased implants, both uncontaminated or contaminated with blood or saliva. In part one, 28 titanium implants, measuring 3.75 mm by 7 to 20 mm, were placed into room temperature, fresh, resected pig mandibles and covered with a flap of gingiva. The overlying tissue was removed with a CO 2 laser at different power levels. Bone‐implant interface temperatures were measured with a thermocouple near the top of the implant, and 5 to 7 mm apical to the osseous crest. The effects of implant size, power level, tissue thickness, and operation time were evaluated. In part two, 5 mm by 4 mm bony dehiscences were created on 3 implants in one mandible and the exposed fixture threads lased at varying times and power levels. The results from part one showed temperature increases at the top thermocouple ranged from 4.2 to 16.8°C and increases at the bottom thermocouple ranged from 2.0 to 11.5°C. The results from part two showed temperature increases at the top thermocouple ranged from 1.2 to 11.7°C and increases at the bottom thermocouple from 0.0 to 5.0°C. If baseline ambient temperatures are 37°C, then the temperature at the bone‐implant interface might exceed 50°C. SEM revealed no gross surface changes in lased uncontaminated implants, but laser treatment alone of contaminated implants failed to completely remove saliva or blood. Further study is needed regarding temperature increases and surface changes induced by lasers that may adversely affect osseointegration. J Periodontol 1995;66:1017–1024.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here