z-logo
Premium
A Comparative Clinical Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Three Toothbrushes
Author(s) -
Khocht Ahmed,
Spindel Lawrence,
Person Philip
Publication year - 1992
Publication title -
journal of periodontology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.036
H-Index - 156
eISSN - 1943-3670
pISSN - 0022-3492
DOI - 10.1902/jop.1992.63.7.603
Subject(s) - gingivitis , toothbrush , dentistry , medicine , brush , randomized controlled trial , orthodontics , surgery , electrical engineering , engineering
T his single (examiner) blind, randomized , 4‐week study compared the safety and efficacy of a new electric toothbrush (experimental) regarding plaque removal and reducing gingivitis with two other brushes, an electric brush (control electric) and a manual toothbrush (control hand). Ninety‐six subjects with 1) a minimum of 15 suitable teeth in acceptable occlusion; 2) a minimum gingivitis score of 0.9; and 3) a minimum plaque score of 1.8 were entered into the study. The subjects were randomly assigned to one of 3 groups: a control hand group (31 subjects), an experimental group (32 subjects), and a control electric group (33 subjects). Device use instructions were given according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Two examiners separately determined either gingival scores or plaque scores at baseline and 4 weeks. In regard to gingivitis, use of all 3 brushes for the study period showed statistically significant improvements in gingivitis scores ( P values <0.01) within each of the 3 groups. Between group analyses of covariance showed that of the 3 groups, the control hand group improvement was better than both the experimental and the control electric groups ( P <0.05). When interproximal gingivitis scores were analyzed separately, similar improvements were noted. Regarding effectiveness of plaque removal during a single brushing event at the initial and final visits, each of the 3 brushes was effective in reducing plaque for every tooth surface scored ( P values <0.01). However, between group analyses of covariances showed that the experimental group was better than the other two ( P <0.01). When facial surfaces were analyzed separately, all 3 brushes were equally effective in plaque removal. But, when palatal/lingual surfaces were analyzed separately, the experimental group was better than both control groups ( P <0.01). When interproximal surfaces were analyzed separately, again the experimental group was better than both control groups ( P <0.01). The safety and efficacy of the experimental toothbrush with respect to plaque and gingivitis score improvements during the 4‐week study interval were demonstrated. J Periodontol 1992; 63:603–610 .

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom