Premium
Compliance With Supportive Periodontal Therapy
Author(s) -
Mendoza Anthony R.,
Newcomb Guy M.,
Nixon Kenneth C.
Publication year - 1991
Publication title -
journal of periodontology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.036
H-Index - 156
eISSN - 1943-3670
pISSN - 0022-3492
DOI - 10.1902/jop.1991.62.12.731
Subject(s) - medicine , periodontal disease , periodontal surgery , dental insurance , dentistry , attrition , private practice , patient compliance , compliance (psychology) , physical therapy , oral health , family medicine , psychology , social psychology
A ll new patients commencing supportive periodontal therapy (periodontal maintenance) after treatment in a specialist periodontal practice from 1983 to 1986 were identified from practice records. Based on their compliance with the recommended schedule of visits, the patients were classified as either compliant or non‐compliant. The results indicated that there were no significant differences between compliant and non‐compliant patients with regards to age, sex, number of missing teeth, plaque score, or periodontal disease severity. More non‐compliant patients than compliant patients were smokers ( P < 0.05). By contrast, more compliant patients were covered by private dental insurance ( P <0.01) and more had periodontal surgery during treatment ( P <0.001). Only 36% of the initial patient sample was found to be compliant at the end of 1989, with the greatest patient loss in the first year of supportive periodontal therapy of about 42%. The annual attrition rate decreased in subsequent years to average about 10% of those remaining in each year, indicating that a patient is more likely to remain compliant if he or she attends for at least 1 year of supportive periodontal treatment. Non‐compliant patients were sent a questionnaire seeking reasons for their non‐compliance. Forty percent of the questionnaires were returned. The most common reason given for non‐compliance was that a general dental practitioner was attending to the patient's periodontal treatment needs. Many considered supportive periodontal therapy to be too expensive, while a significant proportion considered that they no longer required treatment. The results suggest that embarrassment, nervousness, lack of time, practice location, beliefs/ideals, and personal crises were not significant reasons for non‐compliance. J Periodontol 1991; 62:731–736 .