Premium
Increase of Interproximal Bone Density After Subgingival Instrumentation: A Quantitative Radiographical Study
Author(s) -
Dubrez B.,
Graf J.M.,
Vuagnat P.,
Cimasoni G.
Publication year - 1990
Publication title -
journal of periodontology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.036
H-Index - 156
eISSN - 1943-3670
pISSN - 0022-3492
DOI - 10.1902/jop.1990.61.12.725
Subject(s) - interdental consonant , medicine , dentistry , radiography , bone density , orthodontics , periodontology , osteoporosis , surgery , endocrinology
T en interproximal sites , with periodontal pockets deeper than 5 mm and showing loss of bone on standard dental radiographs, were treated by subgingival instrumentation in 10 patients properly motivated and given thorough hygiene instructions. The index of gingival inflammation, the plaque index, the degree of mobility, the depth of the pockets, and the loss of attachment were measured before starting the treatment, and 2 months, 6 months, and 1 year after treatment. Standardized reproducible radiographs of the 10 sites were taken by using a recently developed paralleling instrument before treatment, immediately after and 2 months, 6 months, and 1 year afterwards. The density of the interdental bone was measured on the radiographs by a computer assisted densitometric technique at three levels of the interdental septum: the most occlusal or “superficial” level; the “deep” level, arbitrarily chosen 1.5 mm below; and the “control” level, in a much deeper area of interproximal bone. As further control, the density of the superficial crestal bone was also followed in 5 healthy untreated sites from 5 of the patients. As expected, a significant improvement of the clinical parameters was observed during the year following therapy. The results of the radiographical analysis showed statistically significant increases of both the superficial and deep average densities of interproximal bone at 6 months and 1 year after treatment. The superficial bone density was, on the average, 13% higher at 6 months and 16% higher at 1 year, as compared to that measured immediately after treatment. The improved bone density observed at 1 year could be predicted from the decrease in pocket depths measured clinically at 2 and 6 months and, with a high degree of statistical significance, from the gain of attachment measured at 6 months. J Periodontol 1990; 61:725–731 .