Premium
Problems of Genetic Model Testing in Early Onset Periodontitis
Author(s) -
Boughman J. A.,
Beaty T. H.,
Yang P.,
Goodman S. B.,
Wooten R. K.,
Suzuki J. B.
Publication year - 1988
Publication title -
journal of periodontology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.036
H-Index - 156
eISSN - 1943-3670
pISSN - 0022-3492
DOI - 10.1902/jop.1988.59.5.332
Subject(s) - inheritance (genetic algorithm) , phenotype , genetics , biology , multifactorial inheritance , age of onset , periodontitis , genetic analysis , genetic data , medicine , gene , genotype , disease , pathology , population , environmental health , single nucleotide polymorphism
F amilial aggregation of early onset or juvenile Periodontitis (JP), a disorder that varies in expression and age of onset, has been recognized for some time. Autosomal recessive and X‐linked inheritance patterns have been suggested, and one large pedigree has demonstrated autosomal dominant inheritance. The variability and age limitations in clinical phenotypic diagnosis present several problems to genetic analysis, because information on members of the youngest and older generations may be lost to the analysis. The purpose of the present study was to elucidate the genetic basis of JP by formal pedigree analysis and comparison of competing genetic models. Twenty‐eight families were included, with general and specific autosomal models, and an X‐linked model being compared. The autosomal recessive model provided the most parsimonious explanation of the data, and its likelihood was not significantly different from the more general model. Likelihoods for the sporadic (nongenetic) and X‐linked models were considerably lower than the autosomal models. While comparison of genetic models suggests recessive inheritance of JP, the serious complications to pedigree analysis posed by limitations warns against acceptance of this conclusion, without more exhaustive evaluation of: (1) a more extensive collection of family data, (2) more complete investigation of the effects of age limitations on comparisons among competing models, and (3) elucidation of the importance of diagnosis and phenotype assignment of adults through past dental records.