Premium
The Influence of Trauma From Occlusion on the Bacterial Repopulation of Periodontal Pockets in Dogs
Author(s) -
Kaufman Howard,
Carranza Fermin A.,
Endres Barbara,
Newman Michael G.,
Murphy Neal
Publication year - 1984
Publication title -
journal of periodontology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.036
H-Index - 156
eISSN - 1943-3670
pISSN - 0022-3492
DOI - 10.1902/jop.1984.55.2.86
Subject(s) - gingival and periodontal pocket , dentistry , repopulation , occlusion , medicine , microbiology and biotechnology , biology , periodontitis , stem cell , haematopoiesis
P ockets were surgically created in the two upper external incisors of four beagle dogs, and a copper band adapted to prevent reattachment. After 4 weeks the copper bands were removed, the teeth scaled and root‐planed and crowns placed on both experimental teeth in such a way that one of them was forced bucally when the teeth occluded. An orthodontic appliance anchored in bands cemented to the cuspid teeth brought the tooth back to its original position when disclusion occurred. Experimental time was 12 weeks. Clinical indices and bacterial samples for darkfield examination were taken at baseline and weekly thereafter. The dogs were fed a diet that favored plaque accumulation and no oral hygiene was performed. Surgically created pockets initially became populated by cocci (65%‐75%) and small amounts of motile bacteria (12%‐15%) including 3% to 4% spirochetes. In 4 weeks the percentage of cocci declined steadily (42%‐45%) and motile bacteria increased to 37% to 43% with spirochetes representing 24% to 27%. After scaling and root planing, the number of cocci increased again and motile bacteria declined although the baseline values were not reached. This decline persisted for 2 weeks after scaling. Repopulation of the pocket in traumatized and nontraumatized teeth followed the same initial pattern, taking again 5 weeks to return to prescaling levels. No difference was found between traumatized and nontraumatized teeth. Clinical measurements, however, revealed a statistically greater loss of attachment in traumatized teeth as compared with nontraumatized teeth.