z-logo
Premium
Complications After Implant Site Ridge Preservation and Delayed Implant Placement: A Case Report
Author(s) -
Deporter Douglas A.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
clinical advances in periodontics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.182
H-Index - 2
eISSN - 2163-0097
pISSN - 2573-8046
DOI - 10.1902/cap.2012.120044
Subject(s) - medicine , dentistry , implant , debridement (dental) , crown (dentistry) , bone grafting , surgery
The patient required removal of teeth #2 and #3 as a result of advanced bone loss and an endodontic–periodontic lesion at tooth #3. Case Presentation: The patient began taking metronidazole, 250 mg every 8 hours, 24 hours before surgery. Both teeth were extracted, and, after thorough debridement using curets and saline irrigation, their sockets were packed with bovine porous bone mineral covered by a dense polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) barrier secured with sutures. The barrier was removed at 1 month. After 6 months healing, two dental implants were placed using submerged technique. Four months later, the implants were uncovered and restored with cement‐retained crowns. The patient was contacted 1 year after restoration for reevaluation, at which time both implants showed bone loss. At site #2, a large subgingival cement deposit was seen in radiographs. At tooth #3, bone loss mirrored the original endodontic–periodontic lesion, suggesting that it had not been eradicated. Amoxicillin, 500 mg every 8 hours, was prescribed beginning 24 hours before surgery. The cement on implant #2 was removed, and the associated defect was debrided. Implant #3 was explanted, and its socket was debrided and regrafted using bovine porous bone mineral covered with calcium sulfate paste and then a dense PTFE barrier. The barrier was removed at 1 month, and the sites were allowed to heal for 7 months before replacing implant #3. The replacement crown for implant #3 was screw retained, and both implants appeared healthy 1 year later. Conclusion: Extraction site preservation grafting with xenograft and a barrier is an accepted treatment option but may on occasion result in complications, including failure of dental implants.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here