Premium
INDUCED ATTACK DURING FIXED‐RATIO AND MATCHED‐TIME SCHEDULES OF FOOD PRESENTATION
Author(s) -
Kupfer Anne S.,
Allen Ron,
Malagodi E. F.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
journal of the experimental analysis of behavior
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.75
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1938-3711
pISSN - 0022-5002
DOI - 10.1901/jeab.2008.89-31
Subject(s) - reinforcement , pecking order , context (archaeology) , schedule , psychology , statistics , audiology , developmental psychology , social psychology , mathematics , computer science , medicine , biology , ecology , paleontology , operating system
Adjunctive or induced behavior is generated during a variety of schedules of reinforcement. Several the oretical conceptualizations suggest that rate of reinforcement is the primary variable controlling the strength or levels of induced behavior. The operant response requirement within the schedule context has not been extensively studied as a determinant of induced responding. In the present study, levels of induced attack by food‐deprived pigeons against restrained conspecifics were compared during response‐dependent and response‐independent schedules of food presentation equated or yoked interval‐by‐interval for reinforcement frequency. Experiment 1 compared levels of attack induced by fixed‐ratio schedules of key pecking and yoked “matched‐time” schedules. Experiment 2 similarly compared chained fixed‐ratio 1 fixed‐ratio 74 and yoked chained matched‐time matched‐time schedules. In both experiments, the response‐dependent schedules generated greater levels (amount and probability) of induced attack than the response‐independent time‐based schedules. Thus, the ratio response requirement may be an important determinant of levels of induced responding, and the lower levels of attack observed during the response‐independent condition may not be due to the absence of stimuli predicting food presentations. It is concluded that rate of reinforcement is not the sole variable determining levels of induced responding and that response‐based and time‐based schedules differ in their generation of induced responding.