Premium
DO INFANTS SHOW GENERALIZED IMITATION OF GESTURES?
Author(s) -
Horne Pauline J.,
Erjavec Mihela
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
journal of the experimental analysis of behavior
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.75
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1938-3711
pISSN - 0022-5002
DOI - 10.1901/jeab.2007.11-06
Subject(s) - imitation , gesture , psychology , cognitive imitation , motor skill , baseline (sea) , matching (statistics) , multiple baseline design , developmental psychology , stimulus (psychology) , test (biology) , cognitive psychology , computer science , artificial intelligence , social psychology , intervention (counseling) , statistics , mathematics , paleontology , biology , oceanography , psychiatry , geology
Two experiments were conducted to investigate generalized imitation of manual gestures in 1‐ to 2‐year‐old infants. In Experiment 1, 6 infants were first trained four baseline matching relations (e.g., when instructed “Do this,” to raise their arms after they saw the experimenter do so). Next, four novel gestures that the infants did not match in probe trials were selected as target behaviors during generalized imitation Test 1; models of these gestures were presented on unreinforced matching trials interspersed with intermittently reinforced baseline matching trials. None of the infants matched the target behaviors. To ensure that these behaviors were in the infants' motor skills repertoires, the infants were next trained to produce them, at least once, under stimulus control that did not include an antecedent model of the target behavior. In repeat generalized imitation trials (Test 2), the infants again failed to match the target behaviors. Five infants (3 from Experiment 1) participated in Experiment 2, which was identical to Experiment 1 except that, following generalized imitation Test 1, the motor‐skills training was implemented to a higher criterion (21 responses per target behavior), and in a multiple‐baseline, across‐target‐behaviors procedure. In the final generalized imitation test, 1 infant matched one, and another infant matched two target behaviors; the remaining 17 target behaviors still were not matched. The results did not provide convincing evidence of generalized imitation, even though baseline matching was well maintained and the target behaviors were in the infants' motor skills repertoires, raising the question of what are the conditions that reliably give rise to generalized imitation.