ECONOMIC AND BIOLOGICAL INFLUENCES ON KEY PECKING AND TREADLE PRESSING IN PIGEONS

Pigeons were studied on a two‐component multiple schedule in which the required operant was, in different conditions, biologically relevant (i.e., key pecking) or nonbiologically relevant (i.e., treadle pressing). Responding was reinforced on a variable‐interval (VI) 2‐min schedule in both components. In separate phases, additional food was delivered on a variable‐time (VT) 15‐s schedule (response independent) or a VI 15‐s schedule (response dependent) in one of the components. The addition of response‐independent food had different effects on responding depending on the operant response and on the frequency with which the components alternated. When components alternated frequently (every 10 s), all pigeons keypecked at a much higher rate during the component with the additional food deliveries, whether response dependent or independent. In comparison, treadle pressing was elevated only when the additional food was response dependent; rate of treadling was lower when the additional food was response independent. When components alternated infrequently (every 20 min), pigeons key pecked at high rates at points of transition into the component with the additional food deliveries. Rate of key pecking decreased with time spent in the 20‐min component when the additional food was response independent, whereas rate of pecking remained elevated in that component when the additional food was response dependent. Under otherwise identical test conditions, rate of treadle pressing varied only as a function of its relative rate of response‐dependent reinforcement. Delivery of response‐independent food thus had different, but predictable, effects on responding depending on which operant was being studied, suggesting that animal‐learning procedures can be integrated with biological considerations without the need to propose constraints that limit general laws of learning.