THE GENERALITY OF SELECTIVE OBSERVING

Four rats obtained food pellets by poking a key and 5‐s presentations of the discriminative stimuli by pressing a lever. Every 1 or 2 min, the prevailing schedule of reinforcement for key poking alternated between rich (either variable‐interval [VI] 30 s or VI 60 s) and lean (either VI 240 s, VI 480 s, or extinction) components. While the key was dark (mixed‐schedule stimulus), no exteroceptive stimulus indicated the prevailing schedule. A lever press (i.e., an observing response), however, illuminated the key for 5 s with either a steady liht (S1), signaling the rich reinforcement schedule, or a blinking light (S2), signaling the lean reinforcement schedule. One goal was to determine whether rats would engage in selective observing (i.e., a pattern of responding that maintains contact with S1 and decreases contact with S2). Such a pattern was found, in that a 5‐s presentation of S1 was followed relatively quickly by another observing response (which likely produced another 5‐s period of S1), whereas exposure to S2 resulted in extended breaks from observing. Additional conditions demonstrated that the rate of observing remained high when lever presses were effective only when the rich reinforcement schedule was in effect (S1 only condition), but decreased to a low level when lever presses were effective only during the lean reinforcement component (S2 only condition) or when lever presses had no effect (in removing the mixed stimulus or presenting the multiple‐schedule stimuli). These findings are consistent with relativistic conceptualizations of conditioned reinforcement and extend the generality of selective observing to procedures in which the experimenter controls the duration of stimulus presentations, the schedule components both offer intermittent food reinforcement, and rats serve as subjects.