Premium
VARIABLE‐RATIO VERSUS VARIABLE‐INTERVAL SCHEDULES: RESPONSE RATE, RESISTANCE TO CHANGE, AND PREFERENCE
Author(s) -
Nevin John A.,
Grace Randolph C.,
Holland Shasta,
McLean Anthony P.
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
journal of the experimental analysis of behavior
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.75
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1938-3711
pISSN - 0022-5002
DOI - 10.1901/jeab.2001.76-43
Subject(s) - reinforcement , extinction (optical mineralogy) , preference , statistics , schedule , psychology , interval (graph theory) , mathematics , social psychology , biology , computer science , paleontology , combinatorics , operating system
Two experiments asked whether resistance to change depended on variable‐ratio as opposed to variable‐interval contingencies of reinforcement and the different response rates they establish. In Experiment 1, pigeons were trained on multiple random‐ratio random‐interval schedules with equated reinforcer rates. Baseline response rates were disrupted by intercomponent food, extinction, and prefeeding. Resistance to change relative to baseline was greater in the interval component, and the difference was correlated with the extent to which baseline response rates were higher in the ratio component. In Experiment 2, pigeons were trained on multiple variable‐ratio variable‐interval schedules in one half of each session and on concurrent chains in the other half, in which the terminal links corresponded to the multiple‐schedule components. The schedules were varied over six conditions, including two with equated reinforcer rates. In concurrent chains, preference strongly overmatched the ratio of obtained reinforcer rates. In multiple schedules, relative resistance to response‐independent food during intercomponent intervals, extinction, and intercomponent food plus extinction depended on the ratio of obtained reinforcer rates but was less sensitive than was preference. When reinforcer rates were similar, both preference and relative resistance were greater for the variable‐interval schedule, and the differences were correlated with the extent to which baseline response rates were higher on the variable‐ratio schedule, confirming the results of Experiment 1. These results demonstrate that resistance to change and preference depend in part on response rate as well as obtained reinforcer rate, and challenge the independence of resistance to change and preference with respect to response rate proposed by behavioral momentum theory.