Premium
COMPARING PREFERENCE AND RESISTANCE TO CHANGE IN CONSTANT‐AND VARIABLE‐DURATION SCHEDULE COMPONENTS
Author(s) -
Grace Randolph C.,
Nevin John A.
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
journal of the experimental analysis of behavior
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.75
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1938-3711
pISSN - 0022-5002
DOI - 10.1901/jeab.2000.74-165
Subject(s) - reinforcement , duration (music) , schedule , preference , statistics , constant (computer programming) , psychology , numerosity adaptation effect , variable (mathematics) , terminal (telecommunication) , mathematics , social psychology , computer science , perception , neuroscience , telecommunications , art , mathematical analysis , literature , programming language , operating system
Two experiments explored preference and resistance to change in concurrent chains in which the terminal links were variable‐interval schedules that ended either after a single reinforcer had been delivered (variable duration) or after a fixed period of access to the schedule (constant duration). In Experiment 1, pigeons' preference between the same pair of terminal links overmatched relative reinforcement rate when the terminal links were of constant duration, but not when they were of variable duration. Responding during the richer terminal link decreased less, relative to baseline, when response‐independent food was presented during the initial links according to a variable‐time schedule. In Experiment 2, all subjects consistently preferred a terminal link that consisted of 20‐s access to a variable‐interval 20‐s schedule over a terminal link that ended after one reinforcer had been delivered by the same schedule. Results of resistance‐to‐change tests corresponded to preference, as responding during the constant‐duration terminal link decreased less, relative to baseline, when disrupted by both response‐independent food during the initial links and prefeeding. Overall, these data extend the general covariation of preference and resistance to change seen in previous studies. However, they suggest that reinforcement numerosity, including variability in the number of reinforcers per terminal‐link entry, may sometimes affect preference and resistance to change in ways that are difficult to explain in terms of current models.