Premium
HUMAN PERFORMANCE ON NEGATIVE SLOPE SCHEDULES OF POINTS EXCHANGEABLE FOR MONEY: A FAILURE OF MOLAR MAXIMIZATION
Author(s) -
Jacobs Eric A.,
Hackenberg Timothy D.
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
journal of the experimental analysis of behavior
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.75
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1938-3711
pISSN - 0022-5002
DOI - 10.1901/jeab.2000.73-241
Subject(s) - subtraction , schedule , maximization , reinforcement , interval (graph theory) , statistics , variable (mathematics) , mathematics , computer science , arithmetic , psychology , mathematical optimization , combinatorics , social psychology , mathematical analysis , operating system
Panel pressing was generated and maintained in 5 adult humans by schedules of points exchangeable for money. Following exposure to a variable‐interval 30‐s schedule and to a linear variable‐interval 30‐s schedule (which permitted points to accumulate in an unseen “store” in the absence of responding), subjects were exposed to a series of conditions with a point‐subtraction contingency arranged conjointly with the linear variable‐interval schedule. Specifically, points were added to the store according to the linear‐variable interval 30‐s schedule and were subtracted from the store according to a ratio schedule. Ratio value varied across conditions and was determined individually for each subject such that the subtraction contingency would result in an approximately 50% reduction in the rate of point delivery. Conditions that included the subtraction contingency were termed negative slope schedules because the feedback functions were negatively sloped across all response rates greater than the inverse of the variable‐interval schedule, in this case, two per minute. Overall response rates varied inversely with the subtraction ratio, indicating sensitivity to the negative slope conditions, but were in excess of that required by accounts based on strict maximization of overall reinforcement rate. Performance was also not well described by a matching‐based account. Detailed analyses of response patterning revealed a consistent two‐state pattern in which bursts of high‐rate responding alternated with periods of prolonged pausing, perhaps reflecting the joint influence of local and overall reinforcement rates.