Premium
SOME EFFECTS OF INTERTRIAL‐INTERVAL DURATION ON DISCRETE‐TRIAL CHOICE
Author(s) -
Jones J. R.,
Moore J.
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
journal of the experimental analysis of behavior
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.75
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1938-3711
pISSN - 0022-5002
DOI - 10.1901/jeab.1999.71-375
Subject(s) - changeover , reinforcement , schedule , statistics , duration (music) , interval (graph theory) , preference , mathematics , psychology , computer science , social psychology , combinatorics , telecommunications , art , literature , transmission (telecommunications) , operating system
Pigeons were trained in Experiment 1 on a discrete‐trial concurrent variable‐interval (VI) 1‐min VI 3‐min schedule, and in Experiment 2 on a discrete‐trial concurrent VI 1.5‐min VI 1.5‐min schedule. In each experiment, the intertrial‐interval durations (ITIs) were 0 s, 6 s, 22 s, and 120 s, and the schedules were both independent and interdependent. The purpose of the research was to determine whether lengthening the ITI would disrupt any local control that existed, measured with respect to relative response rate and changeover probability. In Experiment 1, with the independent schedules, both preference and obtained relative reinforcement rate approximated .75 at short ITIs, but then decreased toward .50 with longer ITIs. With interdependent schedules, both preference and obtained relative reinforcement rate approximated .75 at all ITIs. In both experiments, with both independent and interdependent schedules, changeover probabilities for each response in a sequence of up to five successive responses to a given schedule were variable for individual birds. The average changeover probabilities for all birds suggested perseveration rather than a systematic increase within a given ITI or a systematic trend toward chance responding as ITI duration increased. Finally, the changeover functions did not differ when a sequence of responses was calculated to begin anew after reinforcement rather than with the first response on a schedule. Taken together, the data were inconsistent with a theory holding that only local processes underlie choice in discrete‐trial procedures.