Premium
EFFECTS OF FIXED‐INTERVAL SCHEDULE AND REINFORCER DURATION ON RESPONDING REINFORCED BY THE OPPORTUNITY TO RUN
Author(s) -
Belke T. W.,
Dunbar M.
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
journal of the experimental analysis of behavior
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.75
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1938-3711
pISSN - 0022-5002
DOI - 10.1901/jeab.1998.70-69
Subject(s) - reinforcement , lever , schedule , duration (music) , psychology , wheel running , audiology , social psychology , computer science , medicine , engineering , mechanical engineering , art , literature , operating system
Two experiments investigated the effects of schedule value and reinforcer duration on responding for the opportunity to run on fixed‐interval (FI) schedules in rats. In the first experiment, 8 male Wistar rats were exposed to FI 15‐s, 30‐s, and 60‐s schedules of wheel‐running reinforcement. The operant was lever pressing, and the consequence was the opportunity to run for 60 s. In the second experiment, 8 male Long‐Evans rats were exposed to reinforcer durations of 15 s, 30 s, and 90 s. The schedule of reinforcement was an FI 60‐s schedule. Results showed that postreinforcement pause and wheel‐running rates varied systematically with reinforcer duration but not schedule value. Local lever‐pressing rates decreased with reinforcer duration. Overall lever‐pressing rates decreased with reinforcer duration but increased with schedule value. Although the reinforcer‐duration effect is consistent with previous research, the lack a schedule effect appears to be the result of long post‐reinforcement pauses following wheel‐running reinforcement that render the manipulation of the interval requirement ineffective.