Premium
EFFECTS OF HISTORIES OF DIFFERENTIAL REINFORCEMENT OF RESPONSE RATE ON VARIABLE‐INTERVAL RESPONDING
Author(s) -
Ono Koichi,
Iwabuchi Keiko
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
journal of the experimental analysis of behavior
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.75
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1938-3711
pISSN - 0022-5002
DOI - 10.1901/jeab.1997.67-311
Subject(s) - reinforcement , schedule , differential reinforcement , differential (mechanical device) , interval (graph theory) , contingency , psychology , statistics , computer science , mathematics , social psychology , engineering , combinatorics , linguistics , philosophy , aerospace engineering , operating system
Three pigeons were exposed first to multiple differential‐reinforcement‐of‐high‐rate and differential‐reinforcement‐of‐low‐rate schedules that were correlated with green and red keys, respectively, and then were shifted to a variable‐interval schedule arranged on a white key. In subsequent test sessions, the variable‐interval schedule continued to operate, but green and red keys replaced the white key in alternate sessions. In Part 1 of the experiment, the variable‐interval schedule correlated with the white key was introduced immediately after the multiple‐schedule condition, and the test condition began 15 days later. This sequence was repeated twice, with a reversal of the correlation of the key colors with the components of the multiple schedule at the start of each new cycle. Part 2 added a 6‐month break between the multiple‐schedule history and the white‐key variable‐interval schedule followed by test sessions. The procedure was then repeated with a reversal of the correlation between key colors and multiple‐schedule components. In the test sessions of Part 1, all pigeons consistently responded faster in the presence of the key color most recently correlated with the differential‐reinforcement‐of‐high‐rate contingency than during the color most recently correlated with the differential‐reinforcement‐of‐low‐rate contingency. Similar but smaller effects were observed in Part 2. The effects of the reversals in these two parts of the experiment showed that only the most recent contingency exerted an influence on subsequent responding. The data suggest that this effect of the most recent history continues to operate on behavior under current contingencies even after a long lapse of time.