VERBAL SELF‐REPORTS OF EMERGENT RELATIONS IN A STIMULUS EQUIVALENCE PROCEDURE

During a preliminary training phase, college students were taught to categorize each of their responses accurately in a conditional discrimination task as either correct or incorrect. Next, in the absence of self‐reports, subjects acquired conditional discriminations (involving novel stimuli) prerequisite to the formation of two four‐member equivalence classes. The self‐report procedure was reinstated during probe sessions that tested for untrained relations indicative of equivalence class formation. Interspersed trials involving trained relations provided a positive control, and trials with no class‐consistent comparison provided a negative control. Eight of 10 subjects demonstrated equivalence class formation; all accurately reported their performance on trained relations and on trials with no class‐consistent comparison. Subjects also reported their performance on most untrained (emergent) relations accurately, but in several instances self‐reports indicated failure or uncertainty despite nearly perfect emergent‐relations performance. These inconsistencies add to a growing body of literature that suggests there are differences between individual types of emergent relations. We sugggest that the present procedure may be helpful in understanding these differences and other equivalence‐related effects.