Premium
RESPONSE‐RATE DIFFERENCES IN VARIABLE‐INTERVAL AND VARIABLE‐RATIO SCHEDULES: AN OLD PROBLEM REVISITED
Author(s) -
Cole Mark R.
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
journal of the experimental analysis of behavior
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.75
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1938-3711
pISSN - 0022-5002
DOI - 10.1901/jeab.1994.61-441
Subject(s) - variable (mathematics) , schedule , interval (graph theory) , statistics , mathematics , computer science , combinatorics , mathematical analysis , operating system
In Experiment 1, a variable‐ratio 10 schedule became, successively, a variable‐interval schedule with only the minimum interreinforcement intervals yoked to the variable ratio, or a variable‐interval schedule with both interreinforcement intervals and reinforced interresponse times yoked to the variable ratio. Response rates in the variable‐interval schedule with both interreinforcement interval and reinforced interresponse time yoking fell between the higher rates maintained by the variable‐ratio schedule and the lower rates maintained by the variable‐interval schedule with only interreinforcement interval yoking. In Experiment 2, a tandem variable‐interval 15‐s variable‐ratio 5 schedule became a yoked tandem variable‐ratio 5 variable‐interval x ‐s schedule, and a tandem variable‐interval 30‐s variable‐ratio 10 schedule became a yoked tandem variable‐ratio 10 variable‐interval x ‐s schedule. In the yoked tandem schedules, the minimum interreinforcement intervals in the variable‐interval components were those that equated overall interreinforcement times in the two phases. Response rates did not decline in the yoked schedules even when the reinforced interresponse times became longer. Experiment 1 suggests that both reinforced interresponse times and response rate‐reinforcement rate correlations determine response‐rate differences in variable‐ratio 10 and yoked variable‐interval schedules in rats. Experiment 2 suggests a minimal role for the reinforced interresponse time in determining response rates on tandem variable‐interval 30‐s variable‐ratio 10 and yoked tandem variable‐ratio 10 variable‐interval x ‐s schedules in rats.