Premium
CONTRAST AND UNDERMATCHING WITH REGULAR OR IRREGULAR ALTERNATION OF COMPONENTS
Author(s) -
McLean Anthony P.,
Morritt Carole F.
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
journal of the experimental analysis of behavior
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.75
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1938-3711
pISSN - 0022-5002
DOI - 10.1901/jeab.1994.61-407
Subject(s) - reinforcement , contrast (vision) , predictability , alternation (linguistics) , component (thermodynamics) , statistics , mathematics , psychology , audiology , computer science , artificial intelligence , social psychology , linguistics , philosophy , physics , thermodynamics , medicine
Behavioral contrast and response‐ratio sensitivity to reinforcement were compared in multiple schedules in which components alternated strictly or according to a pseudorandom sequence. Average component durations in the two regimes were always 60 s, and order of presentation of component alternation regimes was counterbalanced across subjects. In Part 1, the reinforcer rate in one component was reduced from 60 per hour to zero, while that in the other component was unchanged. Positive behavioral contrast occurred in the constant component in that response rates increased, but neither the reliability nor the magnitude of contrast was affected by the manner in which components alternated. Part 2 was similar, except that a number of different reinforcer rates were used in the varied component. Neither contrast nor sensitivity of response ratios to changes in reinforcer ratios depended on the regime of component alternation. Thus, the predictability in time of future reinforcement conditions, which is a feature of regular multiple scheduling, does not appear to be a determinant of multiple‐schedule performance.