Premium
STIMULUS CONTROL AND RESPONSE BIAS IN AN ANALOGUE PREY‐DETECTION PROCEDURE
Author(s) -
Voss Philip,
McCarthy Dianne,
Davison Michael
Publication year - 1993
Publication title -
journal of the experimental analysis of behavior
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.75
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1938-3711
pISSN - 0022-5002
DOI - 10.1901/jeab.1993.60-387
Subject(s) - timeout , reinforcement , peck (imperial) , stimulus (psychology) , stimulus control , psychology , audiology , communication , statistics , social psychology , cognitive psychology , mathematics , neuroscience , medicine , geometry , nicotine
The present study compared the performance of 6 pigeons trained to detect luminance differences in two different signal‐detection procedures. Exposed to a three‐key array, the pigeons were trained to peck the left key when the brighter of two light intensities had been presented on the center key and to peck the right key when the dimmer of two light intensities had been presented on the center key. Procedure A was a standard signal‐detection procedure in which left/bright and right/dim responses produced food reinforcement and left/dim and right/bright responses produced periods of timeout. Procedure B was designed to simulate some of the contingencies operating in a prey‐detection situation. Left‐key responses produced reinforcement following the brighter center‐key stimulus and a period of timeout following the dimmer center‐key stimulus. Right‐key responses always produced a short period of timeout irrespective of the stimulus. Within each procedure, the duration of timeout arranged for false alarms (left/dim responses) was varied between 3 s and 120 s. Measures of accuracy and response bias were compared between the two procedures. The timeout manipulation produced systematic, but relatively small, changes in these measures when right/dim responses (i.e., correct rejections) produced reinforcement (Procedure A). Arranging timeout for right/dim responses in Procedure B produced greater variability in accuracy and response bias than did arranging reinforcement, but this variability was not related to timeout duration. Overall, discrimination accuracy was considerably higher when right/dim responses produced timeout than when they resulted in reinforcement, and accuracy was accompanied by a large bias toward the response associated with reinforcement. These results are consistent with a recently proposed model of signal detection.