Premium
STIMULUS EFFECTS ON CONCURRENT PERFORMANCE IN TRANSITION
Author(s) -
Hanna Elenice S.,
Blackman Derek E.,
Todorov João Claudio
Publication year - 1992
Publication title -
journal of the experimental analysis of behavior
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.75
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1938-3711
pISSN - 0022-5002
DOI - 10.1901/jeab.1992.58-335
Subject(s) - changeover , reinforcement , stimulus control , discriminative model , stimulus (psychology) , psychology , differential reinforcement , audiology , discrimination learning , statistics , developmental psychology , social psychology , mathematics , artificial intelligence , cognitive psychology , computer science , medicine , neuroscience , telecommunications , transmission (telecommunications) , nicotine
Six experimentally naive pigeons were exposed to concurrent variable‐interval variable‐interval schedules in a three‐key procedure in which food reinforcement followed pecks on the side keys and pecks on the center key served as changeover responses. In Phase 1, 3 birds were exposed to 20 combinations of five variable‐interval values, with each variable‐interval value consistently associated with a different color on the side keys. Another 3 pigeons were exposed to the same 20 conditions, but with a more standard procedure that used a nondifferential discriminative stimulus on the two side keys throughout all conditions. In Phase 2, the differential and nondifferential stimulus conditions were reversed for each pigeon. Each condition lasted for one 5‐hr session and one subsequent 1‐hr session. In the last 14 conditions of each phase, the presence of differential discriminative stimuli decreased the time necessary for differential responding to develop and increased the sensitivity of behavior to reinforcement distribution in the 1st hr of training; during the last hours of training in each condition, however, the effects of the differential discriminative stimuli could not be distinguished from the effects of reinforcement distribution per se. These results show the importance of studying transitions in behavior as well as final performance. They may also be relevant to discrepancies in the results of previous experiments that have used nonhuman and human subjects.