CHOICE AND CONDITIONED REINFORCEMENT

A potential weakness of one formulation of delay‐reduction theory is its failure to include a term for rate of conditioned reinforcement, that is, the rate at which the terminal‐link stimuli occur in concurrent‐chains schedules. The present studies assessed whether or not rate of conditioned reinforcement has an independent effect upon choice. Pigeons responded on either modified concurrent‐chains schedules or on comparable concurrent‐tandem schedules. The initial link was shortened on only one of two concurrent‐chains schedules and on only one of two corresponding concurrent‐tandem schedules. This manipulation increased rate of conditioned reinforcement sharply in the chain but not in the tandem schedule. According to a formulation of delay‐reduction theory, when the outcomes chosen (the terminal links) are equal, as in Experiment 1, choice should depend only on rate of primary reinforcement; thus, choice should be equivalent for the tandem and chain schedules despite a large difference in rate of conditioned reinforcement. When the outcomes chosen are unequal, however, as in Experiment 2, choice should depend upon both rate of primary reinforcement and relative signaled delay reduction; thus, larger preferences should occur in the chain than in the tandem schedules. These predictions were confirmed, suggesting that increasing the rate of conditioned reinforcement on concurrent‐chains schedules may have no independent effect on choice.