Premium
CONTROL OF RESPONDING BY SOUNDS OF DIFFERENT QUALITY: AN EVOLUTIONARY ANALYSIS
Author(s) -
Harrison J. M.
Publication year - 1988
Publication title -
journal of the experimental analysis of behavior
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.75
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1938-3711
pISSN - 0022-5002
DOI - 10.1901/jeab.1988.50-521
Subject(s) - lever , stimulus (psychology) , reinforcement , audiology , psychology , stimulus control , communication , acoustics , speech recognition , computer science , social psychology , cognitive psychology , neuroscience , physics , medicine , quantum mechanics , nicotine
Two experiments investigated the acquisition of discriminations between two acoustic stimuli of different quality (noise bursts vs. a 2‐kHz pulsed signal) when features of the everyday environment were incorporated into the experiments. In Experiment 1, rats were trained, using food, to press a lever. Throughout all sessions, 5‐s trials of noise bursts (the random stimulus) were presented, after variable intertrial intervals, through a remote speaker mounted outside the experimental enclosure. The noise bursts occurred randomly with respect to reinforcement of lever pressing and had no programmed relationship to the animal's behavior. When lever pressing was established, the 2‐kHz signal was presented through a speaker adjacent to the response lever according to a different set of variable intertrial intervals. A response in the presence of the 2‐kHz signal terminated the trial and was reinforced. The 2‐kHz signal acquired control of responding within the first few trials, whereas the random stimulus exerted no control of responding. In Experiment 2, rats were trained to press the lever in the presence of the 2‐kHz signal presented through the adjacent speaker on a variable intertrial interval. After 14 sessions, 5‐s trials of noise bursts (random stimulus) were presented through the remote speaker on the second variable intertrial interval. The random stimulus initially elicited exploratory behavior, which then rapidly declined. Subsequently, the random stimulus exerted no or weak control of responding. The introduction of the random stimulus had no effect on responding in the presence of the adjacent stimulus. In Experiments 3 and 4 the random stimulus was presented through the adjacent speaker, and the stimulus correlated with reinforcement was presented through the remote speaker. In both experiments, there was persistent control of responding by the random stimulus and slow development of control by the stimulus correlated with reinforcement. In Experiment 5, both stimuli were presented through the adjacent speaker. There was persistent control of responding by the random stimulus.