Premium
OPTIMIZATION VERSUS RESPONSE‐STRENGTH ACCOUNTS OF BEHAVIOR
Author(s) -
Vaughan William,
Miller H. L.
Publication year - 1984
Publication title -
journal of the experimental analysis of behavior
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.75
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1938-3711
pISSN - 0022-5002
DOI - 10.1901/jeab.1984.42-337
Subject(s) - reinforcement , statistics , psychology , mathematics , social psychology
Pigeons were run in both single‐key and concurrent‐key experiments in which, over most of the range of response rates, an increase in response rate gave rise to a continuous decrease in reinforcement rate. In spite of the fact that a low response rate would have produced a high reinforcement rate, all birds responded at relatively high rates, thus keeping reinforcement rates substantially below the maximum possible. In the concurrent‐key experiment, in addition to responding at relatively high rates, the birds' ratios of responses approximately matched the corresponding ratios of obtained reinforcers. The results are inconsistent with most theories of optimal performance, which assume that organisms behave in ways that either maximize reinforcement value or minimize deviations from a free‐behavior point. On the other hand, the results are consistent with the assumption that reinforcement strengthens the tendency to respond.