Premium
CHOICE PERFORMANCE IN SEVERAL CONCURRENT KEY‐PECK TREADLE‐PRESS REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULES 1
Author(s) -
Wheatley Kimbal L.,
Engberg Larry A.
Publication year - 1978
Publication title -
journal of the experimental analysis of behavior
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.75
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1938-3711
pISSN - 0022-5002
DOI - 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-181
Subject(s) - reinforcement , pecking order , psychology , statistics , mathematics , social psychology , evolutionary biology , biology
Five pigeons were exposed to several concurrent variable‐interval food reinforcement schedules. For three subjects, one component of the schedule required a key‐pecking response, the other a treadle‐pressing response. For the other two subjects, both schedule components required treadle‐pressing responses. The relative probability of reinforcement associated with the manipulanda was varied from 0 to 1.0 in 13 experimental conditions for the Key‐Treadle subjects and nine conditions for the Treadle‐Treadle subjects. The results indicated that the logarithms of relative time spent responding, and the logarithms of relative number of responses emitted on a manipulandum, approximated direct linear functions of logarithms of the relative frequencies of reinforcement associated with that manipulandum. No systematic bias in favor of time spent key pecking over time spent treadle pressing was apparent for the Key‐Treadle subjects. All subjects exhibited undermatching, in that the ratios of time and response allocation at the alternatives systematically differed from the ratios of reinforcers obtained from the alternatives in the direction of indifference. Key pecking appeared to have no special link to food beyond treadle pressing or what would be expected on the basis of the reinforcement dependencies alone.