Premium
STIMULUS GENERALIZATION FROM FEEDER TO RESPONSE KEY IN THE ACQUISITION OF AUTOSHAPED PECKING
Author(s) -
Sperling Sally E.,
Perkins Mark E.,
Duncan Heather J.
Publication year - 1977
Publication title -
journal of the experimental analysis of behavior
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.75
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1938-3711
pISSN - 0022-5002
DOI - 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-469
Subject(s) - hue , stimulus (psychology) , pecking order , brightness , psychology , second order stimulus , peck (imperial) , reinforcement , stimulus control , communication , mathematics , audiology , artificial intelligence , cognitive psychology , neuroscience , computer science , social psychology , optics , biology , medicine , physics , geometry , evolutionary biology , nicotine
During autoshaping, a 6‐second presentation of one stimulus and a variable time 30‐second presentation of a second stimulus alternated in appearance on a pigeon key. Grain always was delivered for 3 seconds at the end of the first stimulus interval. In the first experiment, autoshaped pecking of the stimulus preceding grain delivery began much sooner when that stimulus was a black vertical line on a white background and the other stimulus was green than when the opposite stimulus arrangement was used. Because these two stimuli differed in form, hue, brightness, and similarity in hue and brightness to the illumination of the raised feeder, three subsequent experiments examined whether the differential speed of autoshaping in the two groups was due to a feature‐positive, feature‐negative effect, a preference for brighter over darker stimuli, a simple preference for white over green, or stimulus generalization from the brightness or hue of the illuminated, raised feeder to the stimulus on the key preceding grain delivery. The data from these experiments showed that the first autoshaped key peck was most likely to be made to the stimulus of the same hue as that illuminating the feeder, regardless of whether that stimulus was positively or negatively associated with grain delivery. At least under some conditions, therefore, stimulus‐generalization mediated response transfer of pecking grain in the presence of the hue illuminating the feeder to pecking the key illuminated by a similar hue appears to account for the occurrence of autoshaped key pecking.