ERRATUM A COMPARISON OF THE KEY‐PECK AND TREADLE‐PRESS OPERANTS IN THE PIGEON: DIFFERENTIAL‐REINFORCEMENT‐OF‐LOW‐RATE SCHEDULE OF REINFORCEMENT 1

Key pecking and treadle pressing in pigeons were compared under concurrent (key‐treadle) and single‐operant differential‐reinforcement‐of‐low‐rate schedules of food reinforcement ranging from 5 to 60 sec (concurrent procedure) or 5 to 120 sec (single‐operant procedure). Under both procedures, the two operants followed the same general law: decreasing response rate and reinforcement rate and increasing number of responses per reinforcement as a function of increasing schedule interval. High correlations were found between key pecking and treadle pressing for the measures of response rate, reinforcement rate, and responses per reinforcement. Regression equations allowed the prediction of treadle pressing from key pecking. More bursting occurred in responding to the key, and key pecking showed a more precise temporal discrimination than treadle pressing. A test for sequential dependencies between key and treadle responses showed significant dependencies not only under the concurrent procedure but also in data created artificially by merging key and treadle sequences from different pigeons under the concurrent procedure and from the same pigeon under the single‐operant procedure. It seems likely that the sequential dependencies found were due to the independent action of the schedule on each operant and that behavioral dependencies did not occur with the concurrent training procedure. The key‐peck operant does not appear to have any special qualities that preclude its use in discovering general laws of behavior, at least under the differential‐reinforcement‐of‐low‐rate schedule. The usefulness of the key peck in other situations requires direct experimental study.