Premium
RESPONSE ADDITIVITY: EFFECTS OF SUPERIMPOSED FREE REINFORCEMENT ON A VARIABLE‐INTERVAL BASELINE 1
Author(s) -
Boakes R. A.,
Halliday M. S.,
Poli M.
Publication year - 1975
Publication title -
journal of the experimental analysis of behavior
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.75
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1938-3711
pISSN - 0022-5002
DOI - 10.1901/jeab.1975.23-177
Subject(s) - reinforcement , stimulus (psychology) , psychology , shaping , stimulus control , audiology , developmental psychology , social psychology , cognitive psychology , neuroscience , medicine , nicotine
Three experiments examined the effects of superimposing free reinforcement (Free VI 30‐sec) on behavior maintained by a response dependent mult VI 2‐min VI 2‐min schedule of reinforcement. Experiment I used pigeons as subjects, key pecking as the response, and colors of response key as the stimuli associated with the multiple‐schedule components. When free reinforcement was added during only one component (Differential condition) a large and highly significant increase in response rate developed in this component. Adding free reinforcement during both components (Nondifferential condition) produced smaller and far less‐consistent effects. An entirely different pattern of results was obtained in two subsequent experiments, where similar procedures and reinforcement conditions were used with rats as subjects and bar pressing as the response. In both Experiments II and III, response rates decreased to the stimulus associated with added free reinforcement in the Differential condition. These findings are interpreted as the result of interactions between behavior maintained by response‐reinforcer contingencies and behavior maintained by stimulus‐reinforcer contingencies. As such, they support the main assumption of an auto‐shaping theory of behavioral contrast, that additivity of responding generated by the two kinds of contingency can occur only in situations favorable to autoshaping.