Premium
THE CONTROL OF SWITCHING INTO BLACKOUT DURING EXTINCTION 1
Author(s) -
Sturmer G.,
Beale I. L.,
Davison M. C.
Publication year - 1975
Publication title -
journal of the experimental analysis of behavior
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.75
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1938-3711
pISSN - 0022-5002
DOI - 10.1901/jeab.1975.23-131
Subject(s) - blackout , reinforcement , extinction (optical mineralogy) , stimulus (psychology) , stimulus control , schedule , psychology , computer science , neuroscience , physics , optics , cognitive psychology , power (physics) , social psychology , electric power system , quantum mechanics , nicotine , operating system
During the extinction component of a multiple variable‐interval extinction schedule, four pigeons learned to peck a second key that switched off the keylights. Two experiments attempted to isolate the events that control this behavior. In the first experiment, switching into blackout was equally maintained when switches were restricted to the first minute as when they were restricted to the last minute of the extinction component. When switches could be emitted in the first and last minutes, they occurred more frequently in the first. Restricting switching to the first minute of each component and eliminating the blackout between components had no effect on switching. In the second experiment, when the stimulus correlated with extinction was omitted, switching decreased slightly. Omission of both multiple schedule stimuli decreased the switching rate, but switching was still maintained. Food reinforcement was then omitted and switching by two birds increased. Switching ceased when blackout was no longer the consequence of pecking the switching key. It was concluded that switching was not controlled by the similarity of the blackouts produced by the switching key and those that occurred between components; nor was it maintained by the temporal proximity of switching responses to the onset of the reinforced component. Finally, switching did not appear to be controlled by the main‐key stimuli correlated with the components of the multiple schedule.