Premium
ABSENCE OF SHOCK‐ELICITED AGGRESSION IN PIGEONS 1
Author(s) -
Rashotte Michael E.,
Dove L. Duane,
Looney Thomas A.
Publication year - 1974
Publication title -
journal of the experimental analysis of behavior
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.75
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1938-3711
pISSN - 0022-5002
DOI - 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-267
Subject(s) - pecking order , reinforcement , shock (circulatory) , psychology , aggression , peck (imperial) , social psychology , biology , medicine , ecology , agronomy
Two pigeons that attacked a taxidermically prepared target pigeon during a schedule of positive reinforcement for key pecking, and two that did not, were shocked through implanted electrodes in the presence of the target. Shock intensities of 2 and 4 mA, durations of 0.1 and 1.3 sec, and frequencies of 2, 6, 20, and 35 per minute were delivered across 16 sessions with 180 shocks per session. No pigeon attacked the target; one pecked the shockplug on its back. The two pigeons that had not attacked during the positive reinforcement schedules were conditioned to peck the target for food reinforcement before another 16 sessions of shock. No attack was observed in these shock sessions. During subsequent positive reinforcement of key pecking, the target was attacked by the two pigeons that had originally attacked and by one that had not. Absence of shock‐elicited attack in these pigeons may be related to the parameters of the experiment or may be yet another instance of the absence of shock‐elicited attack in the class Aves . At least under the present conditions, it was not possible to predict the level of attack during electric shock from the level of attack during schedules of positive reinforcement for key pecking.