Premium
SECOND‐ORDER SCHEDULES: BRIEF SHOCK AT THE COMPLETION OF EACH COMPONENT 1
Author(s) -
Stubbs D. Alan,
Silverman Philip J.
Publication year - 1972
Publication title -
journal of the experimental analysis of behavior
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.75
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1938-3711
pISSN - 0022-5002
DOI - 10.1901/jeab.1972.17-201
Subject(s) - shock (circulatory) , interval (graph theory) , schedule , electric shock , mathematics , component (thermodynamics) , statistics , psychology , audiology , computer science , medicine , combinatorics , physics , thermodynamics , quantum mechanics , operating system
Pigeons worked on second‐order schedules in which completion of fixed‐interval component schedules was reinforced with food according to a variable‐interval schedule of reinforcement. The completion of each fixed‐interval component resulted in the presentation of a brief electric shock. In one condition (shock‐paired), the completion of every fixed‐interval component, including those that ended in food, resulted in the shock. In another condition (shock‐nonpaired), completion resulted in shock except for those components that ended in food. Shock presentations resulted in a positively accelerated rate within fixed‐interval components. This patterning within components was similar whether the shock was intermittently paired with food or not. Response rates tended to decrease as shock intensity increased. The characteristic fixed‐interval response pattern within components did not occur when shock presentations were omitted at the end of each component (tandem schedule). When shocks were scheduled but food was no longer presented (extinction) response rates declined to a near‐zero level. The performance under shock conditions is similar to that in other studies in which visual and auditory stimuli are presented at the completion of component schedules.