Premium
CHANGING THE RESPONSE UNIT FROM A SINGLE PECK TO A FIXED NUMBER OF PECKS IN FIXED‐INTERVAL SCHEDULES 1
Author(s) -
Shull Richard L.,
Guilkey Marilyn,
Witty William
Publication year - 1972
Publication title -
journal of the experimental analysis of behavior
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.75
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1938-3711
pISSN - 0022-5002
DOI - 10.1901/jeab.1972.17-193
Subject(s) - reinforcement , blackout , schedule , statistics , interval (graph theory) , mathematics , pecking order , arithmetic , psychology , computer science , combinatorics , physics , power (physics) , social psychology , electric power system , quantum mechanics , evolutionary biology , biology , operating system
Each of three pigeons was studied first under a standard fixed‐interval schedule. With the fixed interval held constant, the schedule was changed to a second‐order schedule in which the response unit was the behavior on a small fixed‐ratio schedule (first a fixed‐ratio 10 and then a fixed‐ratio 20 schedule). That is, every completion of the fixed‐ratio schedule produced a 0.7‐sec darkening of the key and reset the response count to zero for the next ratio. The first fixed‐ratio completed after the fixed‐interval schedule elapsed produced the 0.7‐sec blackout followed immediately by food. These manipulations were carried out under two different fixed‐interval durations for each bird ranging from 3 min to 12 min. The standard fixed‐interval schedules produced the typical pause after reinforcement followed by responding at a moderate rate until the next reinforcement. The second‐order schedules also engendered a pause after reinforcement, but responding occurred in bursts separated by brief pauses after each blackout. For a particular fixed‐interval duration, post‐reinforcement pauses increased slightly as the number of pecks in the response unit increased despite large differences in the rate and pattern of key pecking. Post‐reinforcement pause increased with the fixed‐interval duration under all response units. These data confirm that the allocation of time between pausing and responding is relatively independent of the rate and topography of responding after the pause.