Premium
RESPONSE CONTROL WITH TITRATION OF PUNISHMENT 1
Author(s) -
Rachlin Howard
Publication year - 1972
Publication title -
journal of the experimental analysis of behavior
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.75
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1938-3711
pISSN - 0022-5002
DOI - 10.1901/jeab.1972.17-147
Subject(s) - intensity (physics) , shock (circulatory) , constant (computer programming) , pulse (music) , electric shock , component (thermodynamics) , chemistry , physics , thermodynamics , optics , medicine , computer science , programming language , quantum mechanics , detector
Pigeons and rats were exposed to multiple schedules with different schedules of electric shock superimposed on identical schedules of food reinforcement during each of two components. During one component, (adjusting‐intensity) the intensity of electric shock depended on responding. Each response increased the intensity while intensity decreased between responses. During the other component (constant‐intensity) the intensity was fixed at the value at which it had been adjusted at the end of the immediately preceeding adjusting‐intensity component. In one experiment, shock was continuous during both components. In another experiment, instead of continuous shock, a brief pulse was delivered immediately after each response. During the adjusting‐intensity component of both experiments, pigeons and rats responded at a rate just sufficient to keep the shock constant (critical rate). During the constant‐intensity component, responding depended on whether shock was delivered continuously or in pulses. When shock was continuous, response rate during the constant‐intensity component was higher than the critical rate. When shock was pulsed, response rate during the constant‐intensity component was equal to the critical rate.