Premium
TIMING IN FREE‐OPERANT AND DISCRETE‐TRIAL AVOIDANCE 1
Author(s) -
Hineline Philip N.,
Herrnstein R. J.
Publication year - 1970
Publication title -
journal of the experimental analysis of behavior
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.75
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1938-3711
pISSN - 0022-5002
DOI - 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-113
Subject(s) - reinforcement , stimulus (psychology) , psychology , aversive stimulus , classical conditioning , operant conditioning , conditioning , cognitive psychology , neuroscience , social psychology , statistics , mathematics
A procedure (“discrete‐trial” avoidance) was devised to differentiate between the two main theories of responding in Sidman's “free‐operant” avoidance procedure. One theory, a version of two‐factor theory, holds that responding is reinforced by the removal of a conditioned aversive stimulus. The conditioned aversive stimulus is held to be temporal, which accounts for the spaced responding, or timing, that Sidman's procedure produces. The other theory holds that the reinforcement for both responding and timing is shock‐frequency reduction. The new procedure eliminated this reinforcement for timing, but retained the conditions for the formation of conditioned aversive temporal stimuli. According to one theory, the new procedure should have sustained timing as well as Sidman's, while according to the other, it should have sustained no timing. The results confirmed neither theory. Timing was found with both procedures, but unequally in degree and kind. Large variations in the precision of timing did not appear to be correlated with successful avoidance for either procedure.