Premium
STIMULUS GENERALIZATION: THE ORDERING AND SPACING OF TEST STIMULI 1
Author(s) -
Stevenson Joan G.
Publication year - 1966
Publication title -
journal of the experimental analysis of behavior
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.75
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1938-3711
pISSN - 0022-5002
DOI - 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-457
Subject(s) - stimulus (psychology) , audiology , stimulus generalization , psychology , communication , mathematics , cognitive psychology , medicine , neuroscience , perception
Twenty‐four pigeons learned a successive discrimination between 500 mμ (S+) and 574 mμ (S—). When tested in extinction, some birds received stimuli around S+, with no S— presentations. These birds showed a positive peak shift, with maximum responding not at 550 mμ, but displaced to 538 mμ and 544 mμ. Other birds were tested with stimuli around S—, with no S+ presentations. These birds showed a negative shift, with least responding not at 574 mμ, but at 586 mμ. Though the first group was tested around S+ and the second around S—, total responding between groups did not differ. When retested on the other half of the continuum, however, birds that had gone from the S+ half to the S— half responded fewer times than those that had gone from the S— half to the S+ half. In a second experiment, reducing stimulus spacing from 6 mμ, to 2 mμ produced flatter gradients and decreased the amount of positive shift. In a third experiment, birds were tested across the whole continuum with stimuli presented in serial order. A sequence from 538 mμ to 586 mμ produced no responding after the first part of the session; a sequence from 586 mμ to 538 mμ produced responding throughout the session.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom