z-logo
Premium
CONTINGENT PAYMENT PROCEDURES FOR SMOKING REDUCTION AND CESSATION
Author(s) -
Stitzer Maxine L.,
Rand Cynthia S.,
Bigelow George E.,
Mead Andrew M.
Publication year - 1986
Publication title -
journal of applied behavior analysis
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.1
H-Index - 76
eISSN - 1938-3703
pISSN - 0021-8855
DOI - 10.1901/jaba.1986.19-197
Subject(s) - abstinence , smoking cessation , test (biology) , reinforcement , psychology , medicine , psychiatry , anesthesia , social psychology , paleontology , pathology , biology
We assessed the ability of a combined contingent reinforcement and intensive monitoring procedure to promote and sustain temporary smoking cessation among 34 hired research volunteers, and the ability of a smoking reduction test to predict the subsequent initiation of abstinence. During the 5‐day cutdown test, subjects were paid from $0 to $6 per day depending on the extent of reduction from baseline CO levels. During the abstinence test, breath samples were obtained three times daily and subjects were paid $4 for each CO reading ≤11 ppm. Sixty‐eight percent of subjects initiated abstinence. Of the breath samples collected during the abstinence test (91% of scheduled samples), 96.5% were ≤11 ppm and 80.5% were ≤8 ppm. Subjects who earned more money during the cutdown test were more likely to abstain ( r = −0.51, p < .001). Contingent reinforcement and intensive monitoring procedures appear to have usefulness for analog studies of smoking reduction and cessation.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here