z-logo
Premium
Application of life cycle thinking in multidisciplinary multistakeholder contexts for cross‐sectoral planning and implementation of sustainable development projects
Author(s) -
Thabrew Lanka,
Ries Robert
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
integrated environmental assessment and management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.665
H-Index - 57
eISSN - 1551-3793
pISSN - 1551-3777
DOI - 10.1897/ieam_2008-064.1
Subject(s) - upstream (networking) , stakeholder , stakeholder engagement , process management , multidisciplinary approach , context (archaeology) , sustainability , sustainable development , business , scale (ratio) , management science , knowledge management , environmental planning , environmental resource management , computer science , engineering , political science , economics , geography , public relations , computer network , ecology , cartography , archaeology , law , biology
Development planning and implementation is a multifaceted and multiscale task mainly because of the involvement of multiple stakeholders across sectors and disciplines. Even though top‐down sectoral planning is commonly practiced, bottom‐up cross‐sectoral planning involving all relevant stakeholders in a transdisciplinary learning environment has been recognized as a better option, especially if the goal is to drive development projects toward sustainable implementation (Rowe and Fudge 2003; Müller et al. 2005; Global Development Research Center 2008). Even though many planning approaches have this goal, there are limited decision frameworks that are suitable for achieving consensus among stakeholders from multiple disciplines with sectoral objectives and priorities. In most instances, the upstream and downstream effects of development decisions are not thoroughly investigated or communicated with the relevant stakeholders, strongly affecting cross‐sectoral integration in the real world (Wiek, Brundiers, et al. 2006). This article presents methodological aspects of developing a stakeholder based life cycle assessment framework (SBLCA) for upstream–downstream decision analysis in a multistakeholder development planning context. The applicability of the framework is demonstrated using simple examples extracted from a pilot case study conducted in Sri Lanka for sustainable posttsunami reconstruction at a village scale. The applicability of SBLCA in specific planning stages, how it promotes transdisciplinary learning and cross‐sectoral stakeholder integration in phases of project cycles, and how local stakeholders can practice life cycle thinking in their village development planning and implementation are discussed.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here