Premium
Assessing and managing contaminated sediments: Part II, evaluating risk and monitoring sediment remedy effectiveness
Author(s) -
Apitz Sabine E.,
Davis John W.,
Finkelstein Ken,
Hohreiter David W.,
Hoke Robert,
Jensen Richard H.,
Jersak Joe,
Kirtay Victoria J.,
Mack E. Erin,
Magar Victor S.,
Moore David,
Reible Danny,
Stahl Ralph G.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
integrated environmental assessment and management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.665
H-Index - 57
eISSN - 1551-3793
pISSN - 1551-3777
DOI - 10.1897/ieam_2004a-002e.1
Subject(s) - sediment , environmental science , risk assessment , environmental resource management , environmental planning , risk analysis (engineering) , computer science , business , geology , paleontology , computer security
This is the second of a two‐part review of the current state‐of‐the‐science pertaining to the assessment and management of contaminated sediments. The goal of this review is to introduce some of the major technical and policy issues stemming from the assessment and management of contaminated sediments, highlight a number of aspects of contaminated sediment assessment and management found to be successful, and, when appropriate, address the barriers that still exist for improving contaminated sediment management. In Part I (Apitz et al. 2005), the key elements of an effective investigation and risk evaluation strategy were reviewed, beginning with the development of a conceptual site model (CSM) and including a discussion of some of the key factors influencing the design of sediment investigations and ecological risk assessment of sediment‐bound chemicals on aquatic biota. In this paper, Part II, various approaches are reviewed for evaluating sediment risk and monitoring sediment remedy effectiveness. While many of the technical and policy issues described in this review are relevant to dredged material management, the focus of this paper is on sediment assessment for environmental management.