Premium
Organophosphorus pesticides in storm‐water runoff from southern California (USA)
Author(s) -
Schiff Kenneth,
Sutula Martha
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
environmental toxicology and chemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.1
H-Index - 171
eISSN - 1552-8618
pISSN - 0730-7268
DOI - 10.1897/03-401
Subject(s) - diazinon , pesticide , environmental science , chlorpyrifos , surface runoff , storm , hydrology (agriculture) , replicate , ecology , biology , geography , meteorology , geology , statistics , geotechnical engineering , mathematics
Large quantities of the organophosphorus (OP) pesticides diazinon and chlorpyrifos are applied to California (USA) watersheds every year, but few data are available on the sources of OP pesticides in urban watersheds. The goal of this study was to characterize diazinon and chlorpyrifos concentrations from different land uses indicative of source categories in urban southern California watersheds. This characterization included analysis of 128 runoff samples from eight different land uses over five storm events. Diazinon was consistently detected (93% of samples) during this study, whereas chlorpyrifos was not consistently detected (12% of samples). The mixed agricultural land use had the highest flow weighted mean (FWM) concentration of diazinon (4,076 ng/L), which exceeded the next‐highest land‐use categories (commercial and residential) by one to two orders of magnitude (324–99 ng/L, respectively). Open space had the lowest concentration of diazinon (<20 ng/L). Concentrations of diazinon at replicate land‐use sites and during replicate storm events at the same site were highly variable. The difference in diazinon FWM concentrations among replicate sites ranged from 1.5‐fold to 45‐fold. The difference in diazinon FWM concentrations among storms at the same site ranged from 1.25‐fold to 30‐fold. Part of this variability is a response to the temporal patterns observed within a storm event. The majority of land‐use site‐events had peak concentrations before peak flow indicating a first‐flush effect, but this was not always a predictable temporal trend. The first‐flush effect was rarely evident in terms of mass loadings because flows can range orders of magnitude during a single event in highly impervious urban watersheds. Flow variability thus overwhelms the variability in diazinon concentrations attributable to the first‐flush effect.