Premium
Shifting gears: assessing collateral impacts of fishing methods in US waters
Author(s) -
Chuenpagdee Ratana,
Morgan Lance E.,
Maxwell Sara M.,
Norse Elliott A.,
Pauly Daniel
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
frontiers in ecology and the environment
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.918
H-Index - 164
eISSN - 1540-9309
pISSN - 1540-9295
DOI - 10.1890/1540-9295(2003)001[0517:sgacio]2.0.co;2
Subject(s) - overfishing , fishing , bycatch , collateral , fishery , fisheries management , business , marine ecosystem , marine protected area , environmental resource management , environmental science , natural resource economics , ecosystem , habitat , ecology , economics , finance , biology
Problems with fisheries are usually associated with overfishing; in other words, with the deployment of “too many” fishing gears. However, overfishing is not the only problem. Collateral impacts of fishing methods on incidental take (bycatch) and on habitats are also cause for concern. Assessing collateral impacts, through integrating the knowledge of a wide range of fisheries stakeholders, is an important element of ecosystem management, especially when consensual results are obtained. This can be demonstrated using the “damage schedule approach” to elicit judgments from fishers, scientists, and managers on the severity of fishing gear impacts on marine ecosystems. The consistent ranking of fishing gears obtained from various respondents can serve as a basis for formulating fisheries policies that will minimize ecosystem impacts. Such policies include a shift to less damaging gears and establishing closed areas to limit collateral impacts.