z-logo
Premium
Bayesian cross‐validation for model evaluation and selection, with application to the North American Breeding Bird Survey
Author(s) -
Link William A.,
Sauer John R.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
ecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.144
H-Index - 294
eISSN - 1939-9170
pISSN - 0012-9658
DOI - 10.1890/15-1286.1
Subject(s) - akaike information criterion , deviance information criterion , bayesian information criterion , model selection , bayesian probability , bayesian hierarchical modeling , computer science , information criteria , selection (genetic algorithm) , hierarchical database model , context (archaeology) , deviance (statistics) , multilevel model , bayesian inference , machine learning , data mining , artificial intelligence , geography , archaeology
The analysis of ecological data has changed in two important ways over the last 15 years. The development and easy availability of Bayesian computational methods has allowed and encouraged the fitting of complex hierarchical models. At the same time, there has been increasing emphasis on acknowledging and accounting for model uncertainty. Unfortunately, the ability to fit complex models has outstripped the development of tools for model selection and model evaluation: familiar model selection tools such as Akaike's information criterion and the deviance information criterion are widely known to be inadequate for hierarchical models. In addition, little attention has been paid to the evaluation of model adequacy in context of hierarchical modeling, i.e., to the evaluation of fit for a single model. In this paper, we describe Bayesian cross‐validation, which provides tools for model selection and evaluation. We describe the Bayesian predictive information criterion and a Bayesian approximation to the BPIC known as the Watanabe‐Akaike information criterion. We illustrate the use of these tools for model selection, and the use of Bayesian cross‐validation as a tool for model evaluation, using three large data sets from the North American Breeding Bird Survey.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here