Premium
Recovering aspen follow changing elk dynamics in Yellowstone: evidence of a trophic cascade?
Author(s) -
Painter Luke E.,
Beschta Robert L.,
Larsen Eric J.,
Ripple William J.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
ecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.144
H-Index - 294
eISSN - 1939-9170
pISSN - 0012-9658
DOI - 10.1890/14-0712.1
Subject(s) - ungulate , national park , range (aeronautics) , ecology , geography , bison bison , physical geography , biology , habitat , materials science , composite material
To investigate the extent and causes of recent quaking aspen ( Populus tremuloides ) recruitment in northern Yellowstone National Park, we measured browsing intensity and height of young aspen in 87 randomly selected aspen stands in 2012, and compared our results to similar data collected in 1997–1998. We also examined the relationship between aspen recovery and the distribution of Rocky Mountain elk ( Cervus elaphus ) and bison ( Bison bison ) on the Yellowstone northern ungulate winter range, using ungulate fecal pile densities and annual elk count data. In 1998, 90% of young aspen were browsed and none were taller than 200 cm, the height at which aspen begin to escape from elk browsing. In 2012, only 37% in the east and 63% in the west portions of the winter range were browsed, and 65% of stands in the east had young aspen taller than 200 cm. Heights of young aspen were inversely related to browsing intensity, with the least browsing and greatest heights in the eastern portion of the range, corresponding with recent changes in elk density and distribution. In contrast with historical elk distribution (1930s–1990s), the greatest densities of elk recently (2006–2012) have been north of the park boundary (~5 elk/km 2 ), and in the western part of the range (2–4 elk/km 2 ), with relatively few elk in the eastern portion of the range (<2 elk/km 2 ), even in mild winters. This redistribution of elk and decrease in density inside the park, and overall reduction in elk numbers, explain why many aspen stands have begun to recover. Increased predation pressure following the reintroduction of gray wolves ( Canis lupus ) in 1995–1996 played a role in these changing elk population dynamics, interacting with other influences including increased predation by bears ( Ursus spp.), competition with an expanding bison population, and shifting patterns of human land use and hunting outside the park. The resulting new aspen recruitment is evidence of a landscape‐scale trophic cascade in which a resurgent large carnivore community, combined with other ecological changes, has benefited aspen through effects on ungulate prey.