z-logo
Premium
Phenotypic plasticity influences the eco‐evolutionary dynamics of a predator–prey system
Author(s) -
Fischer Beat B.,
Kwiatkowski Marek,
Ackermann Martin,
Krismer Jasmin,
Roffler Severin,
Suter Marc J. F.,
Eggen Rik I. L.,
Matthews Blake
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
ecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.144
H-Index - 294
eISSN - 1939-9170
pISSN - 0012-9658
DOI - 10.1890/14-0116.1
Subject(s) - biology , predation , phenotypic plasticity , population , predator , evolutionary dynamics , ecology , trait , experimental evolution , competition (biology) , chlamydomonas reinhardtii , strain (injury) , genetic variation , evolutionary biology , zoology , genetics , gene , demography , sociology , computer science , mutant , anatomy , programming language
There is increasing evidence that rapid phenotypic evolution can strongly influence population dynamics, but how are such eco‐evolutionary dynamics influenced by the source of trait variation (i.e., genetic variation or phenotypic plasticity)? To investigate this, we used rotifer–algae microcosm experiments to test how the phenotypic and genetic composition of prey populations affect predator–prey population dynamics. We chose four genetically distinct strains of the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii that varied in their growth rate, standing levels of defense, and inducible defense. To additionally test for strain specificity of plasticity responses, we quantified protein expression of each strain in the presence and absence of rotifer predators ( Brachionus calyciflorus ). We then tested how different strain combinations influenced the outcome of pairwise competition trials with and without rotifer predation. We tracked individual strain frequencies using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), and compared the observed dynamics to a suite of eco‐evolutionary models of varying complexity. We found that variation in trade‐offs between growth and defense between algal strains strongly influenced the outcome of competition and the overall predator–prey dynamics. Our purely ecological model of the observed dynamics, which allowed for the presence of phenotypic plasticity but no trait variation between strains, never outperformed any of our eco‐evolutionary models in which strains could have different trait values. Our best fitting eco‐evolutionary model allowed strains to differ in an inducible defense trait. Overall, our results provide some of the first experimental evidence that variation in phenotypically plastic responses among prey genotypes can be an important component of eco‐evolutionary dynamics in a predator–prey system.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here