Premium
Community‐specific impacts of exotic earthworm invasions on soil carbon dynamics in a sandy temperate forest
Author(s) -
Crumsey Jasmine M.,
Le Moine James M.,
Capowiez Yvan,
Goodsitt Mitchell M.,
Larson Sandra C,
Kling George W.,
Nadelhoffer Knute J.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
ecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.144
H-Index - 294
eISSN - 1939-9170
pISSN - 0012-9658
DOI - 10.1890/12-1555.1
Subject(s) - earthworm , lumbricus terrestris , biology , temperate forest , mesocosm , ecology , litter , epigeal , burrow , plant litter , lumbricidae , soil horizon , temperate climate , ecosystem , agronomy , soil water
Exotic earthworm introductions can alter above‐ and belowground properties of temperate forests, but the net impacts on forest soil carbon (C) dynamics are poorly understood. We used a mesocosm experiment to examine the impacts of earthworm species belonging to three different ecological groups ( Lumbricus terrestris [anecic], Aporrectodea trapezoides [endogeic], and Eisenia fetida [epigeic]) on C distributions and storage in reconstructed soil profiles from a sandy temperate forest soil by measuring CO 2 and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) losses, litter C incorporation into soil, and soil C storage with monospecific and species combinations as treatments. Soil CO 2 loss was 30% greater from the Endogeic × Epigeic treatment than from controls (no earthworms) over the first 45 days; CO 2 losses from monospecific treatments did not differ from controls. DOC losses were three orders of magnitude lower than CO 2 losses, and were similar across earthworm community treatments. Communities with the anecic species accelerated litter C mass loss by 31–39% with differential mass loss of litter types ( Acer rubrum > Populus grandidentata > Fagus grandifolia > Quercus rubra ≥ Pinus strobus ) indicative of leaf litter preference. Burrow system volume, continuity, and size distribution differed across earthworm treatments but did not affect cumulative CO 2 or DOC losses. However, burrow system structure controlled vertical C redistribution by mediating the contributions of leaf litter to A‐horizon C and N pools, as indicated by strong correlations between (1) subsurface vertical burrows made by anecic species, and accelerated leaf litter mass losses (with the exception of P. strobus ); and (2) dense burrow networks in the A‐horizon and the C and N properties of these pools. Final soil C storage was slightly lower in earthworm treatments, indicating that increased leaf litter C inputs into soil were more than offset by losses as CO 2 and DOC across earthworm community treatments.