Premium
UNDERSTORY VASCULAR PLANT SPECIES DIVERSITY IN THE MIXEDWOOD BOREAL FOREST OF WESTERN CANADA
Author(s) -
Chipman S. J.,
Johnson E. A.
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
ecological applications
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.864
H-Index - 213
eISSN - 1939-5582
pISSN - 1051-0761
DOI - 10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[0588:uvpsdi]2.0.co;2
Subject(s) - species richness , canopy , ecology , understory , environmental science , species diversity , boreal , vascular plant , ecosystem , fire ecology , taiga , biodiversity , geography , biology
One of the goals of ecosystem management has been to maintain plant species diversity. Emulating the “natural” (pre‐European) fire regime is often proposed as a means of accomplishing this goal in fire‐influenced boreal forest ecosystems. Here we examine this hypothesis as it applies to upland vascular plant species in the mixedwood boreal forest of Saskatchewan, Canada. Results from standardized multiple regressions indicate that neither time‐since‐fire nor canopy coverage (light availability) is the most important in accounting for species richness, evenness, and diversity. Instead, the most important factors are hillslope position and surficial geology (i.e., the moisture and nutrient gradients), and of secondary importance is the interaction between time‐since‐fire and canopy coverage (light availability). Diversity and species richness increase downslope as the moisture and nutrients increase. Glacial till hillslopes have higher richness than glaciofluvial hillslopes. The upper parts of hillslopes have lower richness, wider species tolerances, and lower overlap of species frequencies. Lower parts of hillslopes have higher richness, narrower species tolerance, and more overlap of species frequencies. Of secondary importance in influencing hillslope diversity is the interaction between time‐since‐fire and canopy coverage. Younger forests with lower canopy coverage have higher diversity, and older forests with more complete canopy coverage have lower diversity. Thus, upland species diversity in this fire‐dominated ecosystem is determined by the system of hillslope and surficial geology and the interaction between time‐since‐fire and canopy coverage. Finally, species richness can be predicted using hillslope position, time‐since‐fire, and canopy coverage, respectively, from a Digital Elevation Model (DEM), a time‐since‐fire map, and a LANDSAT TM image.