z-logo
Premium
SEED AND SEEDLING ECOLOGY OF TREE SPECIES IN NEOTROPICAL SECONDARY FORESTS: MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS
Author(s) -
Guariguata Manuel R.
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
ecological applications
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.864
H-Index - 213
eISSN - 1939-5582
pISSN - 1051-0761
DOI - 10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0145:saseot]2.0.co;2
Subject(s) - understory , biology , seedling , germination , secondary forest , canopy , ecology , botany
In spite of the growing importance of neotropical secondary forests as sources of timber and environmental services, the baseline information needed to develop silvicultural options is still limited. In this paper I describe interspecific patterns of seed longevity in the soil, germination, and survival and growth of transplanted seedlings under closed canopy of nine tree species that are common in secondary forest stands in wet, lowland Costa Rica and most of which are timber species in the region: Cordia alliodora, Hampea appendiculata, Jacaranda copaia, Laetia procera, Rollinia microsepala, Simarouba amara, Stryphnodendron microstachyum, Trichospermum grewiifolium, and Vochysia ferruginea. Many of these species also occur throughout the lowland neotropics. Experiments were carried out in three replicate secondary‐forest stands (20–30 yr old after pasture abandonment) located at La Selva Biological Station in northeastern Costa Rica. Longevity of experimental seed cohorts differed markedly among species, from <3 mo ( Cordia, Hampea, Simarouba, Vochysia ), to >1 yr ( Stryphnodendron ). Similarly, germination of recently dispersed seeds in the understory ranged from 0% in Laetia to >75% in Cordia and Vochysia. In contrast, seedling survival was uniformly low (<10% survival one year after transplanting except for Stryphnodendron , which showed ∼20% survival). The implications of these findings for the management of secondary forest stands for timber production are varied and depend on the species of interest. First, all study species appear to require nearly complete canopy opening to regenerate as they show limited capacity either to germinate or to survive as seedlings in the understory. Second, some species that can germinate at high levels in the shade can be managed at the seedling stage by opening up the canopy a few months after germination (e.g., Cordia, Simarouba, Vochysia ). Third, species that show little or no germination under closed canopy (e.g., Jacaranda, Laetia, Rollinia ) will need canopy removal simply to germinate in adequate amounts. Due to rapid declines in seed viability and seedling survivorship, however, any canopy manipulation must be performed not beyond 6 mo in order to guarantee adequate levels of soil‐stored seeds or seedlings for future stand development. Site‐preparation techniques may need implementation, given the potential of competing vegetation to interfere with seedlings after canopy opening, as suggested by the high abundance of herbs and shrubs present in the soil seed bank in the study stands. This ecological scenario is likely to occur in secondary stands elsewhere in the region as secondary stands are usually located within agricultural land. Finally, the results of this study suggest that ecological classifications of trees solely based on light preferences for stem growth may fail to account for important differences among species in their regeneration mode. This is of particular importance for refining silvicultural guidelines in neotropical secondary forests.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here