Premium
CARRY‐OVER EFFECTS OF WATER AND NUTRIENT SUPPLY ON WATER USE OF PINUS TAEDA
Author(s) -
Ewers Brent E.,
Oren Ram,
Albaugh Timothy J.,
Dougherty Phillip M.
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
ecological applications
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.864
H-Index - 213
eISSN - 1939-5582
pISSN - 1051-0761
DOI - 10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[0513:coeowa]2.0.co;2
Subject(s) - nutrient , transpiration , canopy , pinus <genus> , irrigation , environmental science , loblolly pine , botany , zoology , agronomy , biology , horticulture , ecology , photosynthesis
A study of the effects of nutrients and water supply (2 × 2 factorial experiment) was conducted in a 12‐yr‐old stand of loblolly pine ( Pinus taeda L.) during a period in which soil moisture was not augmented by irrigation because of frequent rain events. Information on the responses of sapwood‐to‐leaf area ratio and early‐to‐late wood ratio, to four years of treatments led to the hypothesis that the combination of increased nutrient and water supply (IF treatment) will increase tree transpiration rate per unit leaf area ( E C,1 ) above E C,1 in the control (C), as well as increasing E C,1 above that when either the supply of water (I) or of nutrients (F) is increased. We further hypothesized that canopy transpiration ( E C ) will rank IF > F > I = C, based on the ranking of leaf area index ( L ) and assuming that the ranking of E C,1 is as first hypothesized. We rejected our first hypothesis, because F had lower E C,1 than the other treatments, rather than IF having higher values. We could not reject the second hypothesis; the ranking of average daily E C was 1.8 mm for IF, 1.2 mm for F, and 0.7 mm for both C and I ( se < 0.1 mm for all treatments). Thus, it was the lower E C,1 of the F treatment, relative to IF, that resulted in ranking of E C similar to that hypothesized. Lower E C,1 in F trees was found to relate to lower canopy stomatal conductance, even though soil moisture conditions during the time of the study were similar in all treatments. Only trees in the F treatment absorbed a substantial amount of water (25%) below 1 m in the soil. These results indicate a “carry‐over” effect of irrigation when combined with fertilization that increases E C in irrigated trees, relative to unirrigated trees, even under conditions when soil moisture is high and similar in all treatments.