Premium
Forest restoration in a mixed‐ownership landscape under climate change
Author(s) -
Ravenscroft Catherine,
Scheller Robert M.,
Mladenoff David J.,
White Mark A.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
ecological applications
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.864
H-Index - 213
eISSN - 1939-5582
pISSN - 1051-0761
DOI - 10.1890/08-1698.1
Subject(s) - abies balsamea , climate change , balsam , forest management , disturbance (geology) , environmental science , black spruce , forest restoration , context (archaeology) , silviculture , forest ecology , agroforestry , ecosystem , ecology , geography , taiga , forestry , biology , paleontology , archaeology , horticulture
The extent to which current landscapes deviate from the historical range of natural variability (RNV) is a common means of defining and ranking regional conservation targets. However, climate‐induced shifts in forest composition may render obsolete restoration strategies and conservation targets based on historic climate conditions and disturbance regimes. We used a spatially explicit forest ecosystem model, LANDIS‐II, to simulate the interaction of climate change and forest management in northeastern Minnesota, USA. We assessed the relevance of restoration strategies and conservation targets based on the RNV in the context of future climate change. Three climate scenarios (no climate change, low emissions, and high emissions) were simulated with three forest management scenarios: no harvest, current management, and a restoration‐based approach where harvest activity mimicked the frequency, severity, and size distribution of historic natural disturbance regimes. Under climate change there was a trend toward homogenization of forest conditions due to the widespread expansion of systems dominated by maple ( Acer spp.). White spruce ( Picea glauca ), balsam fir ( Abies balsamea ), and paper birch ( Betula papyrifera ) were extirpated from the landscape irrespective of management activity; additional losses of black spruce ( P. mariana ), red pine ( Pinus resinosa ), and jack pine ( P. banksiana ) were projected in the high‐emissions scenario. In the restoration management scenario, retention and conversion to white pine ( P. strobus ) restricted maple expansion. But, widespread forest loss in the restoration scenario under high‐emissions projections illustrates the potential pitfalls of implementing an RNV management approach in a system that is not compositionally similar to the historic reference condition. Given the uncertainty associated with climate change, ensuring a diversity of species and conditions within forested landscapes may be the most effective means of ensuring the future resistance of ecosystems to climate‐induced declines in productivity.